Front Page › Forums › AUDIO & TECHZONE › Audio Chat › Question: DAT Recorders
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 18, 2006 at 5:28 pm #534640
junoParticipantI’ve only recorded in through my computer so far but i need another means of recording now with this more rock-centered project.n Can I use a standalone Technic tape deck unit for a DAT recorder? I want to be able to record on tape and then record that tape into my computer. I dont know much about the sound quality of tapes so I was hoping someone may have some experience in recording this way.
AdSense 336x280July 18, 2006 at 5:28 pm #593630
junoParticipantI’ve only recorded in through my computer so far but i need another means of recording now with this more rock-centered project.n Can I use a standalone Technic tape deck unit for a DAT recorder? I want to be able to record on tape and then record that tape into my computer. I dont know much about the sound quality of tapes so I was hoping someone may have some experience in recording this way.
AdSense 336x280July 18, 2006 at 6:19 pm #593638
In SilicoParticipantIf you have a Technics DAT recorder, you could use that for sure, but probably not just a Technics home tapedeck.
Just to clarify, a standard audio cassette recorder isn’t a DAT (Digital Audio Tape)tape deck. DAT tapes are larger, digital, and look more like a Hi-8 DV tape or something. They store in very high-quality digital recordings, and are usually only good for 10-15 recordings before stretching can affect timing and you risk losing quality or some audio from your recording.
IMHO Tascam and Marantz make some of the best recording/playback decks in all formats, but I personally use a Tascam recorder for my DAT deck.
-Rob / IS
AdSense 336x280July 18, 2006 at 9:24 pm #593661
lewelschParticipantdo not forget : SONY DAT
For me personally, is DAT still the best recording media, without compression, just 1:1 recording.
i use the Sony PCM-R300 and the TCD-D7 (Portable)
and for Digital-Copy: Hucht Copy Processor MK 3
LeWelsch
AdSense 336x280July 19, 2006 at 4:59 am #593698
JuggernautParticipantDAT tapes look like mini DV tapes…(i’ve accidentally stuck one into my mini dv camcorder once…) and yeah they are thicker in dimension etc.
I’ve only ever used Tascam dat recorders and used either an rca or optical out option to connect to a computer.
If you’re doing multitrack recordings maybe having a 16 track HD recorder is an option? if you have a loom of some sort and a decent sound card you can hook up each track to that in your DAW, it could *possibly* save time.AdSense 336x280July 19, 2006 at 5:45 am #593699
lewelschParticipantWikipedia DAT:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Audio_Tape
Hucht Copyprocessor:
http://www.minidisc.org/part_Hucht_Elek … _1-CE.html
LeWelsch
AdSense 336x280July 19, 2006 at 2:46 pm #593739
In SilicoParticipantCan I start calling you L’encyclopedic Welsch?
AdSense 336x280July 19, 2006 at 6:22 pm #593758
junoParticipantI appreciate all the feedback
I’ll have to look into buying a decent recorder. I just need something thats more portable than my multitrack and computer + i’d just like to learn how to use one.
LeWelsch, is SCMS elimination only needed when you copy a tape onto a minidisc? What kind of advantages do you get from transfering your audio onto minidisc?
AdSense 336x280July 19, 2006 at 8:03 pm #593762
lewelschParticipantSCMS elimination:
for all digital copy possibilities
DAT, MD, CD, etc,Why Minidisc ?
For the play the tracks in the Car, by Friends, etc.but if you search a portable Recorder forget DAT (these times are past )
I recommend the Microtrack 2496 M-Audio

http://www.maudio.co.uk/products/en_gb/ … -main.htmlLeWelsch
AdSense 336x280 -
AuthorPosts
The forum ‘Audio Chat’ is closed to new topics and replies.
