Front Page › Forums › AUDIO & TECHZONE › Audio Chat › COPYRIGHT ISSUES
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 5, 2007 at 12:24 am #638488
anisinaParticipantMcCar wrote:Guys… I know that clear original songs are copyrighted but what about the mixes and remixes?Still copyrighted to the original copyright holder.
AdSense 336x280December 5, 2007 at 3:03 am #638492
djstevemanParticipantAll i know is if your not makin any money off the artists acapella your good to go. But you do want to make money off of the acapella that you used cause its in your creation. then yes you have to get permission. sucks i know but its the law lol
AdSense 336x280January 21, 2008 at 12:07 pm #641634
acheadKeymasterfree licences are a good alternative to copyright
and the philosophy is interensant aswellAdSense 336x280January 29, 2008 at 2:01 am #642255
acheadKeymasterOr…you can back door the thing and release a promotional product that has your "bonus mixtape" packaged with it…just as long as the promo is not tied to the the mixtape in any way, you could be good. I know nothing about copyright law, but read something similar in another forum that seemed like this was a potential loophole in the system?? But if it were me?? Free license on copyrights all the way!
AdSense 336x280March 15, 2008 at 12:51 pm #645488
acheadKeymasterAhh just create and worry about it later. No point wasting creative time worrying about the law til its time 4 signing.
AdSense 336x280April 5, 2008 at 2:49 pm #647247
deevidParticipantEASY, JUST RELEASE IT ON WHITE LABEL
AdSense 336x280May 5, 2008 at 8:16 am #649091
acheadKeymasterwhat if you mkae a mix ut dont sell it, like remixs that you gve your friends an stuff, also sory for speelling the keyored is messed up
AdSense 336x280May 5, 2008 at 8:50 pm #649115
cosmicjiveParticipantIts actually pretty easy to get around. You might get some hot shot rapper who say’s f*** you and has it pulled, but I know Kraddy from the Glitch Mob released an album called "the Illegal Album" comprised of remixes he didnt get permission to sell and he’s selling it, no one really cares.
AdSense 336x280May 25, 2008 at 8:29 pm #650089
acheadKeymaster[quote quote="DJ LMA aka DJ Leethal":2qtsxjmg]yeah no doubt i’ll be lookin, but in the mean time, I’m just gonna put out my own sh** and hope I don’t get caught cause f*ck it, I need ta get paid…..and it ain’t even just about that, but just that I can do somethin fun and make a little somethin for myself in the process you feel me?
Peace yo.
1[/quote:2qtsxjmg]that wat im taking about cuz… having fun and making money. thats wats up!!!AdSense 336x280May 26, 2008 at 12:49 pm #650119
the remixerParticipanthey fellas wut about myspacemusic.com they have in big bold letters warning not to use copywritten material is it worth creating a page to post remixes or will you eventually be kicked off the site
AdSense 336x280July 25, 2008 at 11:51 am #654092
BuBaParticipantHere is a fine documentary about that
http://www.surfthechannel.com/info/docu … ?aid=91061
A lot explained about copyrights.
Enjoy
AdSense 336x280August 3, 2008 at 4:23 am #654501
noescapehatchParticipantJust to clear up a few misconceptions people have about copyright. In the UK copyright arises automatically and is an unregistered right unlike other forms of intellectual property such as trademarks and patents. With regards music, therefore anything you create will automatically be protected by copyright provided the work is original and it is fixated i.e. recorded. A song would consist of two separate categories of protected works: the literary works i.e. the lyrics and the musical works.
Whilst copyright is not infringed for private non-commercial use; issuing, ‘communicating’ by electronic means or playing any copyrighted works to the public without the permission of the copyright owner(s) would constitute copyright infringement.
However for a claim of primary copyright infringement to be upheld the infringement must be in relation to a substantial part of the protected works. It is questionable whether merely using parts of an acapella for example would constitute using a ‘substantial’ part of the works.
If you are found liable for copyright infringement the court can either order you to pay the copyright holder what profits you have made or to pay damages which are usually the same amount as what you would have had to pay the owner for a licence to use the work. Either way, its best to ask permission to use the vocals if you plan to circulate your work to a wide audience whether for profit or not. Due to the costs involved in pursuing a claim its more likely to be the big labels that would come after you!
AdSense 336x280August 25, 2008 at 10:47 pm #655774
cameronc650ParticipantTo be fair….if you put in the work, you should get paid.
AdSense 336x280September 29, 2008 at 12:01 am #657169
djlodoseParticipantlol.. This was for those who are just a bit scared of Big Brother…lol
Peace
AdSense 336x280September 29, 2008 at 12:05 am #657170
djlodoseParticipant[quote quote="spacejettison":1vuwnl03][quote quote="fgp303":1vuwnl03]very simple u will dont have right for nothin

if u will find the original music maker, song writer, artist and label, they can give right for the remix and if u give a grant for it u have a big luck… but never left in the 99% of the event u will not get nothin if u dont have record label in ur backside…
but if u will get rights for the music usualy its only right for the remix making (99% of the events) which not to good cos u will make it for the original artist and they will pick up the money if ur song will make some…i think much better if u pay a vocalist and he/she sing it again the vocal, its much easier belive me
[/quote:1vuwnl03]i was wondering…wont u get charged for using the lyrics of that song? or is there a loophole for that…cuz arent lyrics copyrighted too? just wondering
[/quote:1vuwnl03]Nope. Just makes the artist look weak cause he or she is just duplicating what someone else originally thought. Like Nas once said "No Idea is Original"
AdSense 336x280October 9, 2008 at 12:40 pm #657867
acheadKeymasterI’m looking for
AdSense 336x280October 9, 2008 at 1:51 pm #657886
BassTekk! [Hoodzy]Participantdjrique wrote:I’m looking forthe rules. Please help me[color color=red:3jelpyf3][size size=150:3jelpyf3]NO REQUESTS[/size:3jelpyf3][/color:3jelpyf3]
AdSense 336x280October 16, 2008 at 11:44 pm #658375
acheadKeymasterThey jus tryin’ to make some green
AdSense 336x280October 30, 2008 at 6:42 pm #659120
cameronc650ParticipantArtist’s should be rewarded for their labour.
AdSense 336x280December 29, 2008 at 12:52 am #661499
p.illaParticipantJust a suggestion if your a software producer. Some softwares (if you bought it) gives you the option to record information such as the date, name of the author and then it saves it for you. I’ve never bought a software in my life but I heard from word a mouth.
AdSense 336x280January 1, 2009 at 3:34 pm #661716
larrykooleParticipantDo a lot of musicians actually get messed with for copyright issues?
AdSense 336x280January 1, 2009 at 7:22 pm #661770
joshlawsonParticipantsame mate, im still lost, its all legal nonsense!
AdSense 336x280January 24, 2009 at 9:47 pm #663046
alecParticipant^^^ legal nonsense indeed. I just think its like most people have said: if your makin crazy good remixes and their getting played – as long as you’re not making any money off of it (or don’t appear to be) then its all good.
AdSense 336x280February 14, 2009 at 1:56 pm #664119
aaronv2Participanti think its crap some pop artist sues for royalties and copyright to some song that is a cover of an original 80s hit or an old diva classic. They should really stop and think about what is going on. I have seen the lifestyle of these people do you honestly need 5 cars? Isnt the adoration of your fans and the money they bring to concerts and merch tents?
That being said true artists with original stuff really do need to protect their stuff. Its tragic when some artist dies and years later some young gun thinks they can do it better.
AdSense 336x280February 17, 2009 at 10:24 pm #664280
mynameisnicParticipantThe New Zealand govt is about to pass a law that forces ISPs to cancel internet connections and take down websites ON ACCUSATION of copyright infringement. how shit is that?
at http://www.CreativeFreedom.org.nz there has been a song made which is free to download called the "copywrong song" and there is also a remix competition. All the details are on the website, you guys should all have a go at remixing it.
AdSense 336x280May 15, 2009 at 7:34 am #667559
Nicky BluntParticipantask dj drama he’ll tell u
AdSense 336x280June 2, 2009 at 6:17 pm #668307
rickfcParticipanthow about if u post a minimix on myspace … is that ilegal ?? i mean ..it not like your gonna get some money for them … its just for fun .and the owner of the songs should be thankfull for the promo…
AdSense 336x280June 7, 2009 at 11:17 pm #668504
evesonParticipantthe reality of it is, unless you’re shifting huge numbers (a rare thing in more underground music) it’s very rare any copyright owners are gonna come looking for you for their share of a few hundred quid you can potentially make out of a release, most labels will put stuff out without worrying about it…if you’ve got a hit on your hands and you’re gonna be shifting a significant amount of copies, then’s the time to go clearing samples..
AdSense 336x280August 1, 2009 at 8:46 pm #670450
djjohnnymacParticipanttechnically if you use any part of a song and use it without being given an individual license to do so you’re in copyright infringement.
AdSense 336x280September 19, 2009 at 4:15 pm #672122
OhneSoundParticipantcopyrights are anyway just like when tape decks came out that could record–the funny thing is its not illegal to record it off the radio unless they imply it is and i never hear a radio station say that
AdSense 336x280 -
AuthorPosts
The forum ‘Audio Chat’ is closed to new topics and replies.
