|
|
|
|
|
|
Okay,
Right about now its time to announce what you been waiting for! The people going through to Round Three are as follows:-
Eric B
djrapko
Se7en
DJ Leethal
G Money
Blow
The Round two remixes were Judged bu DJ Val, Cutter and Myself!! On a whole we looked for good production, Sound Quality, creativity & the most important thing Timing!!!!! !! I hope everybody agrees with our Choices.
Thanks to everyone who took part in Round two!! Voting was really hard as there was so many quality remixes......
I hope to have Round Three listings and pellas up tomorrow / Thursday......
Good Job everyone
Peace |
|
Last edited by Lexus on Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:18 pm; edited 2 times in total
_________________
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Well done evry1 for gettin thru! Good luck in the next round & if any1 dropz out, a call 1st dibbz on their place  lol!
Peace! |
|
_________________
It's been a long time, shouldn't have left you...
The Cypha will be mine!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
| i dont know wat 2 say, i thought i put up a good mix, but yeh good luck to every1 still in it |
|
|
|
|
|
vice verses
|
| Supremo ACAS4U Member |
 |
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
yea good luck everyone still in,...
i too thought my mix was worthy, but i guess we all think that of our own mixes!! lol
til next time gadget.....
V.V. |
|
_________________
(the streets - stay positive)
Stop dreaming
People who say that are blaspheming
They're doing nine to five and moaning
And they don't want you succeeding when theyve blown it
And your idols - who are they?
They too dreamt about their day |
|
|
|
|
pretty_ugly
|
| ACAS4U - a full PHAT 11/10! |
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| i knew that my mix was garbage so haha no surprise that i didn't make it |
|
|
|
|
|
Choo
|
| Arh baby, ACAS4U's gotta hold on me. |
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eyyy, good luck to the next 6, drop them excellent mixes, here!
Cheers,
Choo |
|
|
|
|
|
GMoney
|
| Arh baby, ACAS4U's gotta hold on me. |
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Looking forward to the next round, good luck y'all! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well done to all, some great mixes all round i thought.
Best of luck to all in the next round, looking forward to it.
Peace  |
|
|
|
|
|
blow = Dj Smuggla
|
| Arh baby, ACAS4U's gotta hold on me. |
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yea well done to all that got thru... and good luck... 
Bad luck to those who never...there were some heavy remixes last round...
Hope more will follow...
safe |
|
Last edited by blow = Dj Smuggla on Wed Sep 06, 2006 7:16 pm; edited 1 time in total
_________________
 |
|
|
|
|
DJ Sho-Tyme
|
| ACAS4U Phreakazoid |
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
now hate to sound like a sore loser, but i didnt agree with the decision made, in my opinion. you say that the main thing you judged was timing. if you d/l the original twerkulator and listen to G-money's mix (no offence man, i PM'd you bout this anyway) it isnt timed at all. just wonderin who came to that decision. i spose it would be good to leave the mix comp now tho coz i woulda hated being kicked out in the final round but another instance like this one.
also out of my own curiosity, if, for example an Aussie or NZ did win, wouldnt it cost too much outta pocket to ship the "free prize" over anyway |
|
|
|
|
|
GMoney
|
| Arh baby, ACAS4U's gotta hold on me. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ^ You're correct and incorrect. It was definitely NOT timed the same as the original, which is not to say it was off beat. Just shifted. I liked it that way. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| well done to everyone who got through! |
|
_________________
 |
|
|
|
|
DJ Sho-Tyme
|
| ACAS4U Phreakazoid |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GMoney wrote: |
| ^ You're correct and incorrect. It was definitely NOT timed the same as the original, which is not to say it was off beat. Just shifted. I liked it that way. |
hey bro, didnt meant to offend you. i just though the way that lexus wrote 'and most importantly the timing' clearly the original would have at least been listened to to judge the mixes. that is the importance of the timing. how can you judge timing without listenin to the original or you wont know how the remix should sound. thats all i meant. as i PM'd ya, your mix was alright with the beat that it lined up to, i just felt that at this stage of the comp, ppl should be showin their skills.
you coulda blitzed it if only you lined up the verses, but with that said, you were still able to creep into the next round. whos laughin now...not me |
|
|
|
|
|
EricB
|
| No longer the Rookie |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Congrats to all that competed, much respect to you all.
See the rest of yas in the next round...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DJ Sho-Tyme wrote: |
| GMoney wrote: |
| ^ You're correct and incorrect. It was definitely NOT timed the same as the original, which is not to say it was off beat. Just shifted. I liked it that way. |
hey bro, didnt meant to offend you. i just though the way that lexus wrote 'and most importantly the timing' clearly the original would have at least been listened to to judge the mixes. that is the importance of the timing. how can you judge timing without listenin to the original or you wont know how the remix should sound. thats all i meant. as i PM'd ya, your mix was alright with the beat that it lined up to, i just felt that at this stage of the comp, ppl should be showin their skills.
you coulda blitzed it if only you lined up the verses, but with that said, you were still able to creep into the next round. whos laughin now...not me |
Now listen, Timing to me on a remix means the dj's own interpritation of where the pella should sit.... A remix should not be compared to the original!! that is why its a remix ( a remix should be judged for what it is and not compared)...... |
|
_________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lexus wrote: |
| Now listen, Timing to me on a remix means the dj's own interpritation of where the pella should sit.... A remix should not be compared to the original!! that is why its a remix ( a remix should be judged for what it is and not compared)...... |
Lexus a have to disagree with that. Ok a remix should be different from the original, therez no disputin that (az u know thatz what a alwayz say  ) BUT there haz to be a certain degree of comparison. Even something lyke someone sayin "itz better than the original". Now there iz many a remix with the same beat az the original bit with a different pella added to or instead of the original.
Am sure everyone haz their own opinion on this matter & we could talk to the cowz come home. Am just givin myne az u & Sho-Tyme gave urz.
A will now post a topic asking "What Is A Remix To You?".
Peace |
|
Last edited by Seanza on Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:12 pm; edited 1 time in total
_________________
It's been a long time, shouldn't have left you...
The Cypha will be mine!!! |
|
|
|
|
dj complex
Currently banned |
| ACAS4U Phreakazoid |
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lexus wrote: |
Now listen, Timing to me on a remix means the dj's own interpritation of where the pella should sit.... A remix should not be compared to the original!! that is why its a remix ( a remix should be judged for what it is and not compared)...... |
So based on your theory i can remix a fast pella with a slow instrumental and it would be excellent because its different to the original. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| dj complex wrote: |
| Lexus wrote: |
Now listen, Timing to me on a remix means the dj's own interpritation of where the pella should sit.... A remix should not be compared to the original!! that is why its a remix ( a remix should be judged for what it is and not compared)...... |
So based on your theory i can remix a fast pella with a slow instrumental and it would be excellent because its different to the original. |
In theory yes you could do this but you would still need to match the tempo between the two. So therefore neither the original pella or imental would be the same as before. You already know this. So why ask this question? What's your point?
As far a judging the mixes it's not all about the the timing. Yes timing is very important. We also look at how the mix was created. If someone were to just take both the pella and imental and slap them together without much alteration to either it wouldn't be as technical as when someone re-arranges(cut, edit, alter) both or even better if someone has the ability to create an original piece of music. As long as the original piece of music is pu | | | | | |
